|
Transcript for
AEJMC 2005
Interactive Journalism Summit:
When Consumers Become Creators
August
12, 2005
San Antonio,
Texas
David Wiseman
Project Manager, Loudoun Forward
David Wiseman: I
started this with a friend of mine, Tamar Datan, and it’s just
the two of us right now. You’re looking at 50 percent of Loudoun
Forward.
We’re trying to help people understand the
changes in their lives and provide a way to better own their community.
That’s
kind of our overriding goal.
I just wanted to start out by talking
a bit about Loudoun County. It’s
really close to the nation’s capital and that drives a lot
of things. There are a lot of government workers, and it’s
close to a very affluent and growing metro area. It’s a place
where a lot of people commute into Washington.
Growth is the biggest
issue in Loudoun County right now. In the ‘60s
it was a very rural, agrarian economy. Loudoun was the largest producer
of milk in the region.
Now there’s one dairy farm there and they are about to leave us
next year.
These are census numbers. In 2000, we were the
fastest growing county in the country with 100.000 people or more,
and by 2020
we’re supposed
to hit a little over 400,000. By 2010 we’re a little over
the curve here with 230,000 [population].
For those over 25,
17 percent are high school graduates, 27 percent have some
college, 32 have a college degree and 15 percent have
an advanced
degree. And the household income for Loudoun County is a whopping
$104,000. There are a lot of two-earners.
Of the roughly 110,000
people over 25 in Loudoun County, roughly 47 percent have some form
of college degree. And if we can
just get 25
percent of
those people, that is 13,000 people who could be subscribers
and could interact with Loudoun Forward. And just to put
that in perspective,
that’s
the same number of people who voted countywide for the person
that sets the agenda for the County Board of Supervisors.
More people in the county vote for president than
they do for the Board of Supervisors, and that’s kind of an
odd thing because decisions that are made on the Board
of Supervisors far outweigh any effects that
the presidential election has.
Just a quick thought on growth:
The pace at which growth occurs in the county compresses all the
decision times
there. So when
you have
a limited
time to make a decision, it seems like the arguments
all become very polar. Either one side or the other — there’s
no consensus building. There’s no time to build
a consensus. So extreme positions become the norm in
the
county and it’s a pretty shrill political
environment right now.
Talking about the political environment:
It’s polarized. There’s
reaction then counter reaction. There are no staggered
terms. There are nine members of the Board of Supervisors
and they are all elected at
the same time, so nine go on and nine come off.
And
they can have subsequent terms, and it usually swings
7-2 Republican or 2-7 Republican, and it’s
usually based on what their position is on growth.
It’s
the biggest-driving decision-making thing in the
county.
Right now in the political environment it’s
hard to get any kind of consensus.
So what motivated
Tamar and myself to start this thing? Well, we saw low levels of
public participation.
I
guess this is
normal because citizens don’t have the
time to become subject matter experts unless
it directly affects them or their families.
Also,
it’s not a good setting for people
to share opinions, knowledge or expertise
at the
Board of Supervisors meeting. The only time
you get
to publicly comment is letters to the editor
or at the Board of Supervisors meeting and
it’s a very official, on-the-record
kind of thing, and it’s very intimidating
for a lot of people.
There is a low level
of public knowledge. People don’t
become experts until it affects them and
you get
that not-in-my-backyard reaction. And
I submit that, in Loudoun, if you have
a backyard, something is eventually going
to
happen there. So you need to know what’s
going on.
There’s a lack of context
right now with the current media in place.
Currently, Loudouners get plenty of news,
but not much context, so it’s
hard for someone to figure out where
that news story fits into the bigger
picture.
It’s a very this-week mentality,
instead of this-year, or the next four
years.
We’ve got two weekly papers.
One’s issued on Wednesday and
one on Thursday. A lot of people get
The Washington Post. There’s
a metro section, but it touches on
local counties with the local news
scene. The
Post has recently come out with a Loudoun
edition. It comes
out every Wednesday, but it’s
about what happened last week in Loudoun
County.
Then there’s the react
versus plan mindset: People just
react instead of planning and that’s
what we’re
trying to get them to stop doing
in the community.
This is a little
thing I put together
that shows you how we’re
going to try to tackle the news versus
the contextual topics.
Here’s
what happens now: Say in July you
get two articles about education,
nothing about health care, a big
article on technology and
a little one about housing concerns.
Then in August, you get a lot of
education news. In September: a
couple little health care issues are
touched on, nothing about technology.
So there’s
no real coherence there.
We’re
going to try to do it this way.
As part of our civic toolset,
we’re
going to try to compile all of
the articles about technology,
healthcare, housing, conservation
and crime in a kind of vertical
way
so that people can say, “Gosh,
what happened last year about
growth or technology?” Then,
they can go back to an archive
they
can refer to.
There are challenges:
time. People just don’t
have a lot of time to sit down
and read things. I think it’s
the highest hurdle we have
to overcome.
I think most media
entities
have this challenge: the
attention span. Often
conflict makes
news in the county
and there
is a lot of conflict
right now. Our challenge
will be to create a hook for people
that
doesn’t
depend on conflict.
There
will be several things
that we think the established
media
don’t
provide right now and that we
will provide.
• How does it affect them. We think that is one of the hooks.
Clyde mentioned dogs. People love dogs and they don’t like to talk
about really important things like a new power line going in, unless
it’s going in their
backyard. So maybe we need
to talk about the politics
of dogs, or
some Trojan horse, or kids,
to get into the homes that
way.
So we’re just trying
to connect all these various
dots that effect people
in a very real
way.
• Providing context. How does this fit into to what happened last year
and what will happen in the next five years. We talked
about that.
•
Creating dialogue. There’s not a lot of dialogue in the county except at
these very contentious meetings, and we’re
going to create public forums were
people have another venue
to have dialogue.
• Memory. People are just way too busy to
remember things unless it directly affects them. We hope to help them
remember things or at
least provide them access to
an archive to help them
jog their memory.
One of our challenges, structurally,
is that we don’t
have an institutional
home. We’re not
sponsored by another
entity, a university
or anything. So we
have a challenge to
build
an infrastructure and
keep it going.
Here
are the five components
of the vision that
we have. It’s
very similar, I think,
to the other panelists.
1.
We’ll have a discussion paper and it will be delivered to every
household in the county and it will be a very deep and thorough analysis
and study of a
problem. We hope to
have a couple writers working on this. We hope it will be the TIME magazine
of just Loudoun County. Maybe it’s
more academic in nature.
2.
We’re going to have moderated public forums. Some of them will
be very small. We might have one
that is just focused on religion, where you might have
only 30 [people]
at a time. And there will be some large events.
3.
We will have a community
Weblog. We already have it up and running. It
will be a moderated forum so that when people get the discussion
paper, they can go to
this Web site and
discuss. There will be threads that will go on for as long as they
need to be there. There are a lot of really smart people in Loudoun.
We want to bring
other people into the conversation who just aren’t
there right now.
4.
We’ll have a topic-centered newsletter. Some people may not be
interested in education, but someone may be very interested in technology.
So they will
be able to subscribe
to a technology newsletter, so anything news that comes up that relates
to technology, we’ll
push that to
them so they can keep up to date on it. I know The Washington
Post does that
right now and
I know a lot
of papers
are doing
it. I subscribe
to several
topics on
The
Post and
they push
out a lot
of articles
with very national
implications.
These are
going to be
very local
implications.
5. And lastly, this
topic-centered Web archive, where you can go back and research by topic.
We had a public meeting that was by
invitation only. We invited around
17 people:
community leaders, republicans, democrats,
bankers — we
had very prominent
people in the
county. We
had farmers.
They
came up with
these
ideas for
the first
issue, and
we’re
still noodling ideas for it:
•
The creative class. I don’t know if anyone has read any of the
Richard Florida books on the creative
class and
the effects the creative class has on
culture and the economy, that kind
of thing.
• Research universities in Loudoun. We are going to do a student survey
on the news that came out of Loudoun on theatrical censorship
there.
•
What does Loudoun look like when the oil runs out? Everyone’s got two or
three cars in Loudoun County, and one of them is probably a Hummer now, so we’re
going to try to study what it would be like if we couldn’t
depend on our cars so much.
•
Politics 101. People just don’t like politics, but I think our challenge — our
goal — is just to make it relevant to them. We need to find the hook of
why people don’t think it
matters because it really does.
• The power of homeowners associations in Loudoun. I think something like
70 percent of the people are members of a homeowners association
and they are very powerful,
almost quasi-government types of
things. So you write your check every month to this group and there may be two
or three people who
are making big decisions
on your home.
• And then culture, art, economic development.
Those are some of the ideas that this group came
up with for our first issue.
Here
are six
goals:
- Maintain a nonpartisan, unbiased platform for sharing information and
ideas.
- Broaden the number of voices and perspectives.
- Provide a deeper understanding of the things affecting everyone’s
lives.
- Improve the deliberative process. We want to shorten the distance between
the public and policy. That’s one of the things we’re
trying to do.
- Sponsor and promote forums for public dialogue to give people who are
uncomfortable with
the current, various limited forms of dialogue, better forums for it.
- Foster the proactive community thinking and decision-making processes.
So, in short, just to help people understand the changes in their lives
and help them better own their communities.
• Return
to transcript menu
|